...if in the beginning, things were "good very"...let's say no mutations...that is to say, there are less mutations as we go farther & further back n time...if things were more pristine...more sustainable...more ecologically compatible...existed within a range of homeostasis...more efficient...more resistant to vulnerabilities...then how could white skin have been part of that beginning...that scenario?
...how do u explain the un-denied & undeniable fact of the genetic closeness between indians and caucasians and aryans? no one denies this. in fact, the narrative that indians, northern africans-even ethiopians, middle eastern, far east asians and russians & such, have been classified as aryan-caucasians, attest to this closeness. but, it is also well accepted that the indian genetics are the older and thus the "parent" so to speak. hence, the more accurate interpretation of the data would be that aryan-caucasians and such are indian. that is to say that, aryan-caucasians descendant from the southern region, of india. when we continue this backward "de-trapolation" the only logical conclusion-destiny, is that the southern indians, as are all indigenous people, descendants of africans.
...if mankind originally migrated out of equatorial africa...[for my believing sistrs & brothrs, this would mean noah was of th original sufficiently pigmented population-tht population of a very distinct gene pool-likely th neanderthal gene; wth regards to my secular inclined sistrs & brothrs...noah's set of triplets-who most likely were not identical, could hv been the carriers or not, of th original pigmentation mutation gene-which could hv been a mutational consequence of th shortening telomeres-which eventually resulted n substantianily shortening lifespans...]...how could white skin have been a part of that pre-migration population...?
...if today, it is a known fact that the very definition of significant lightr skin, pale skin & white skin, is insufficient pigmentation, which necessarily makes it (th skin) more vulnerable to sun burn, skin cancer & etc... then when & where did this mutation originally occur...1st manifest itself among that original sufficiently pigmented population...?
...if vitamin D is a stored micro-nutrient (dissolved and stored in our fat) and we only need very small amounts (micro-grams) on a daily bases or even weekly bases, and darker skin is designed to limit the synthesis of vitamin D but resist skin burn and skin cancer, woudn't it make sense tht darker skin synthesize less vitamin D...? ths does seem most logical and beneficial. now on the other hand, th paler th skin, th more vulnerable to skin burn & skin cancer but more able to synthesize more vitamin D. for persons living in industrialized (over developed) environments, who typically spend most of their time indoors and with most of their bodies covered with clothing, synthesizing more vitamin D wud seem to b a partial & relative benefit.
many persons of industrialized (over developed) environments r said to b vitamin D deficient and are urged to take synthetic vitamin D supplements or ingest foods supplemented with synthetic vitamin D. hence, in an abnormal environment of less sun exposure, the mutated paler skin is able to synthesize more vitamin D with less exposure to the sun, than th typical-healthier darker skin. but for the normal and typical pigmented human who lives and works outside in equatorial africa; paler skin would be most deficient as it would synthesize too much vitamin D (perhaps to toxic levels) and still be prone to skin burn and skin cancer. again, if our bodies (the human body) was designed for constant exposure to sun-in equatorial africa, then wouldn't it make sense that it would also be designed to synthesized a healthy-small amount of the micro-nutrient, vitamin D, that is effectively dissolved and stored in our fat?
tht said, from another perspective, with africa as th anchor of th once 1 large land mass continent, a substantial part of that single-large-land-mass-continent was still north of 50 degrees north...so these migrating dark skinned ppl would have had to eventually adapt to th cooler-colder weather; requiring some coverings-presuming th weather patterns then were similar to more recent weather patterns (tht is based on migration patterns b-4 th great flood & th great continental divide)...still, all indigenous populations mongolians, inuits, & th most southern tip of th southern most western continent and islands are relatively quite pigmented as compared to pale-white skinned peoples...
there is no other valid, plausible scientific explanation for red, yellow, san-tan, pale & white skin-(white skin being th most rare form of albinism) othr than nsufficient pigmentation due to a genetic mutation-albinism. this mutation was perhaps 1st manifested as red skin tone and lots of straight hair; as perhaps depicting esau when he was born. this red skin toned would have been a result of an atypical ratio of the primary proteins needed to produce the melanin for the typical black skin tones. the original typical "black dn't crack" skin tones, perhaps ranged from a very dark-"blue black", a deep dark brown and a dark chocolate brown-all considering darkening of th skin due to constant sun exposure...i think perhaps it was some time later that this pigmentation ratio mutation perhaps became a pigmentation deficient mutation. the question of noah 's triplets (about 2490 bce) all being carriers is possible...though th 1st mentioned of "white skin" is again, almost 1000 years later, during the exodus when God change mirian's skin white (about 1460 bce). the most western continents & islands were the last lands to be inhabited. based on the genetics & appearances of these 1st inhabitants, these africans may have been descendants of esau-y chromosome, admixed with some admixing with their female cousins of seth's & japheth's descendants (via th mitochondria). some of these late migrators to their new world, may have mixed with some of the earliest "white skinned" people or their admixed relatives, while migrating to th new world. or some of th last existing isolated tribes' ancestors were admixed with th earliest white skinned folk who invaded th most western continents & islands-to account for th more "yellow skin" relatively isolated indigenous people. they speak of ongoing invasions by whites into their territories and their family members being murdered-it is not hard to imagine, that over th passing generations, that many of these indigenous women were likely raped, as well.
in any case, these are some of the questions that have to be asked and genuinely considered; regardless of how contrary it may seem to conventional beliefs & no matter the extenuating implications. as such, this has been a difficult journey for me. i discontinued the work on the timeline, pyramidal science and the 1st mutations blog, in order to deal with my own personal issues. the whole issue of "white skin" and all of it's "baggage" has provoke some self reflections. i am now persuaded that i have to deal with my own hurt, pain, anger, bias, rage, revenge seeking emotions with regards to the infamous legacy of "white skin". i have examined my motives, my narrative, & my objectivity in pursuing this project. even as i ponder the next words, i am swelled up with painful emotions of sadness and hurt with the thought of the overwhelming effects of "racism" (which is really simply pigmentationism, since there is only 1 human race-african) and the carnage that has been left in its wake. i am now convinced that as i continue to work through my pain, this narrative is still valid and needed. until we face this ugly monster of "pigmentationism" in the face, as a people-that is all people, we are self destructing. that is we are in a constant state of self annihilation.
it should also be noted that, if all the original people were sufficiently-thus normally & effectively pigmented-protected from the vulnerability of sunburn, contracting skin cancer & resistant to wrinkling, then it was these originally and sufficiently pigmented people-all of our ancestors who the biblical text in genesis 6, describes as having only violence & evil on their minds & n their hearts all of the time. it is these dark pigmented africans (from adam-esau) who did all of the good and bad of those ancient times. noah was one of these dark skinned-normally pigmented africans. it was these dark skinned-normally pigmented africans who after the flood, built the great pyramid (about 2260 bce) & who were noah's direct descendants. and it was these dark skinned-normally pigmented africans who after th scattering by nation, by tribe & by family, spread out & migrated away from that unprecedented city. it was these dark skinned africans who migrated farther out from egypt & this during th relatively rapid continental divide-divergence; which lasted pretty much the life span of peleg (239 yrs)-th fourth generation from shem. this original plain of shinar (mizraim-kemet-egypt) was abandoned & left desolate for most of that time...most places were hard press for any significant architectural development during that time of the continental divergence. as the earth slowed to a relative stand still, people began to increase in number & need more resources. & invariably, as is our human nature; per our affinity for fear & ignorance, & in spite of th fact they (dark skinned-normally pigmented peoples) were still quite closely related, they eventually started warring, hoarding and subjugating each into servitude & enslavement-hagar was egyptian servant. abraham and lots herdsmen, began quarreling about grazing space for their herds. white skin people do not even come on the scene in any significant numbers until about 1100 bce (according to genetic anthropologist spencer wells-see his doc. th journey of man)...almost 800 yrs after the time that esau is said to have been born. again, th 1st biblical text mentioning or any biblical indication of "white skin" is when miriam & aaron grumbled against moses for having an ethiopian wife (during th exodus about 1460 bce (1 kings 6:1 & see pattern of evidence; exodus)..it is likely, tht at ths time, they grumbled against moses because she was a descendant of ham (canaan's cursed bcuz of ham may have extended n2 a longer & general dislike of ham's descendants by seth & japheth descendants...) & not necessarily because of her darker skin...
i am almost equal parts black, indigenous to the most western continents and white...
what does that even mean...black, indigenous to the mwc and white...? in my understanding, people are more accurately and simply categorized by culture and genetic closeness relationship. in contrast th most erroneous-unscientific-misleading and divisive manner to categorize people is by quantity & quality of pigmentation. at some point, our white skin sisters and brothers became the majority of the global northern regions (north far west asia) and much of the global central far east asia region. at some point, decisions were being made based on peoples attitudes regarding issues of status that eventually became associated with skin tone; then skin color-in effect, pigmentation levels. those that primarily resided indoors would necessarily be less tanned than those who resided primarily outdoors. th offspring of those (normally pigmented) who mated with "white skin people-albinos" & with their admixed offspring, would necessarily have the genetic propensity for less pigmented-paler skin.
as architect became a status symbol & those who lived in such deem themselves superior to others, it is no stretch of the imagination that this superiority complex would eventually be used to deflate th value of those who were non architectural dwellers. it seems that those that built temples of worship but themselves still resided mostly out doors would have an appreciation of both such cultures...still, it is sufficiently documented that with th viral like spread of "white skinned ppl" came physiological vulnerabilities. these physiological vulnerabilities, manifested as diseases among the virgin pigmented populations and decimated the originally pigmented populations; which eventually made dominance over then a matter of inevitability. as the original pigmented ppl died off, the "white ppl" who had effectively mated with the original pigmented ppl, overtime became physiologically strong enough to increase in number. (they eventually developed immunity to their own diseases and became less vulnerable to sun burn and skin cancer). in so doing, these northern far west asians and central far east asians became a new and somewhat unique subunit of africans. it must also be noted that these "white skinned" infants, could not have survived if they had not been nurtured and cared for with intense intervention of love and protection from the sun.
if red skinned is another form of insufficient pigmentation-a differing ratio of the pigmentation proteins, then those unique and 1st inhabitants of these most western continents and island are also descendants of the originally normally pigmented africans who originated out of equatorial africa...these africans, in there long established isolation; also became a very unique subunit of the original equatorial africans. however; th most western islanders, generally speaking; th polyneasians are said to be genetically closer to th south eastern asians of australia; th aboriginal people. it has been documented that they likely came across by sea, by boat, by cosmological navigation from southern east asia.
as the infamous age of colonizing sovereign lands and people went viral-literally...the subunit group of admixed northern far west asians; caucasions and aryans invaded the remaining isolated lands of the remaining originally pigmented people, even th heart of africa itself. the anchor continent and cradle of humanity, even down to its most southern tip, has suffered tremendous degradation of its original people, lands & resources and continues to be so. each invasion brought diseases that the indigenous people had not had opportunity to develop immunity against. these disease invasions, along with the deliberate killing-murdering and raping of the indigenous sufficiently pigmented populations; made the population replacement rather easy in many places. the result of which is most evident today. that said, some indigenous people suffered prior to such invasions due to natural disasters (divine intervention-see ezekial 28).
as th more objective science has shown repeatedly, we are all 1 people. we are warring with our sisters & brothers over something as comparatively speaking, insignificant as pigmentation. it is my hope that by God's will, our blinders will b removed. some, who read this may gnash their teeth, while others may contemplate the plausibility and implications of this narrative. ultimately, we are responding as africans; however far removed from th actual continent, it isn't that far generationally speaking. (1 resource suggested about only a 120 generations ago.) it is ultimately, in fact, that we are all african; genetically speaking. culturally speaking, we are all of differing, once isolated subunits of africans-now presenting the various effects of pigmentation mutation-albinisms. pigmentation wise, we are seemingly a range of sufficient pigmentation and insufficient pigmentation; that is very densely and moderately pigmented (the majority of people) to relatively little to no pigmentation at all; pale to ultra white skin; (with ultra white skin being the most rare presentation).
with these thoughts in mind...how do we process our feelings, our on going pain, sadness and rage with respect to the ongoing stories of global bias and violence against people manifesting certain "african features" and "people of color". even though it is a scientific fact that these african people carry the parent genes of us all-and carry the broadest range of phyenotypes-physical features of any other population. how does one process the ongoing attack against the beauty and diversity that is ultimately originally african? and how does one stop hating a part of themselves; whether that "caucasian-aryan" part that reminds them of that pain, that many have to endure, still to this day or that part of themselves that is originally and ultimately, only african, that fills them with insecurity?
i have found it difficult to accept the subunit caucasian-aryan genetics that is a part of me. my great great grandfather is said to have been a "white land owner". my grandfather and mother are most evident of this fact. my light chocolate skin has been significantly sunburned on one occasion. i try to stay naturally tanned-via the sun. (skin cancer is growing among even those presenting the most darkest skin in africa.) i claim a spiritual belief that requires an unnatural response to affliction, wrong doing and oppression by the hands of others. but as i see it now, who have i not afflicted, who have i not done wrong to-whether in thought-feelings or actions? that said, i do invariably and seemingly naturally, pain over the enslavement of the indigenous people-africans, as i pain over the european's barbaric african holocuasts, israelis blinded slaughter of palestinians, europe's savagery against itself, the chinese fight (altho invariably misguided as all such human efforts) for sovereignty, south africa's continued fight against the ongoing effects of apartheid, the usa's delusional self righteousness in underpinning pigmentationalism while pretending to be enlightened, india's-britain's cast system and australia's fight against that viral bastion of pigmentationism. still, balancing "turning the other cheek" with righteous indignation, is difficult.
granted, i was incredulous when i first came across this information-white skin being a result of the albino mutation. initially, i thought it another attempt by some "black people" to overcome their inferiority complex by psyching themselves up with an outlandish assertion. i challenged myself to read on-as i was striving to hear and listen to other perspectives before i denounced them. eventually, the logic, the science and the wealth of information won out. i couldn't deny the science, nor the overwhelming pattern of evidence. even though, i kept questioning myself and my objectivity. then i became incredulous, dump-founded by the overwhelming sense of being duped by the caucasian-aryan lie. this sensation was even more potent then the 1st. the extent, the length of time, the ongoing, the hatred, needed to fuel such a deception is still mind boggling. it necessarily turns the tables, to question who really has an inferiority complex. our caucasian-aryan sisters and brothers who sought fit to destroy and literally defaced ancient ruins so as to hide the original so-called "african features". this legacy of self hatred as continued and deepen over all these millenniums. as painful as this assertion may be, it does effectively give some plausible explanation-narrative of all the pieces of data and th documented records of past events.
we are all black people, genetically speaking. over time some of our ancestors were isolated from those who continued to intermingle as in the mediterranean, mesapotamia and middle east regions. but those ancestors who migrated to remote areas and who mated among themselves; developed distinct features. couple that with various presentations of albino mutations of pigmentation production. one such variation was perhaps the protein ratio, resulting in red skin and straight hair. perhaps the decrease production of pigmentation came later, resulting in paler to white skin-void of any pigmentation. in either case, those carrying and presenting such mutations did mate with typical pigmented people and their offspring eventually became pigmented enough to survive. these continued to mate among themselves and eventually produced a subunit of atypically pale skin people, who typically had straight-curly hair (blonde-red-brown-black), and blue-green-gray-brown-black eyes, broad-narrow noses, and full-thin-no lips; all of which are still manifested today among albinos of every subunit of people today.
hence our race, that is the human race is essentially, african. our cultural status is based on the region and traditions we were brought up in. our nation or nationality is based on the governing body that controls that region and whether or not it is recognized by the international community. our skin tone and our skin color are simply physical-phenotype features of typical and atypical pigmentation levels; which have unfortunately been associated with race, ethnicity & status.
in addition, conventional medicine tends to standardize itself according to the minority group of most pale skin peoples; making typically pigmented people seem as if they are at odds with what is normal and healthy. this scheme, however; cannot distort the fact that those who live in industrialized environments and eat industrialized diets suffer more from chronic ill health as metabolic diseases and genetic disorders, than those who live and work outside, who are more pigmented and who eat traditional diets.
if i therefore, seem unsympathetic to some of my insufficiently pigmented sisters and brothers, who have been born and or raised in the caucasian-aryan subunit population and culture, i do pray for forgiveness and patience...i am a work in progress. i am striving to process it all and come forth in healing, compassion and forgiveness. i should add that the recent empathetic movement among many of my self-acknowledged privileged pale skin sisters and brothers, is most encouraging.
lastly, i had to ask...why. why Gret Love would U establish such a thing; a mutation among your people that would result in so much disease, disorder and disunity. then i thought, if physical entropy was always the intended objective as far as the natural reality is concerned, then it makes perfect sense. all of the divine interventions of mutations, increased the rate of entropy. th increased in pain with child birth, the decreased life spans, and the pigmentation mutation; which also comprises of one of th 1st lines of immune defense; th skin, all work to increase the rate of entropy. th immune system was made more vulnerable as sun burned skin is weakened and skin cancer is insidiously damaging to the basic health of cell division. as well, mutations, overtime, invite further variant mutations to occur.
as much as the ancients who became the greeks and romans were described as a terrible and horrific manifestation to be placed among the earth (see daniel 9-12), they were no less created by God; as we all are. we all have contributed to the violence, to the hatred, to the ugly and bad that is arguably the basic nature of humanity. yes, there is still a global and distinct root of ongoing exclusion, warring, and of oppression against "people of color". but perhaps, in these final divine interventions, we may embrace each other as we embrace ourselves and forgive each other as we forgive ourselves...at least this is my hope and my prayer for us all.